But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP This item doesn’t belong on this page. The X’s text print quality left a lot to be desired on our tests. I love it because it works on I print a lot of things! I thought an all-in-one printer was suppose to fax.
|Date Added:||10 May 2011|
|File Size:||48.51 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Casual home users who value network-readiness will love that feature, but users who want better print quality will be happier with a different machine. But if your focus is on print quality, check out the Canon Pixma MP Show More Show Less.
caon Lexmark X all-in-one review: Printing from laptops or other wirelessly connected computers from anywhere around the home is certainly a luxury, but crucially the Lexmark fell short of expectations in other areas.
I thought an all-in-one printer was suppose to fax. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.
Lexmark X | TechRadar
The Canon MG is a fast, easy-to-use printer with plenty of attractive features Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. Lexmark printer I Already have Lexmark printer’s this one came with a paper jam and it took me cahon while to find the problem.
It was soundly trounced, too, in 4×6 photo prints. Best Selling in Printers See all. Considering that Lexmark is such a big name in the world of business printing, the X feels surprisingly flimsy, with a build quality that doesn’t seem to match the competition.
Lexmark X all-in-one review: Lexmark X all-in-one – CNET
Review Sections Review Specs. I Already have Lexmark printer’s this one came with a paper jam and it took me a while to find the problem. The Good Built-in wireless networking; speedy text canoj onboard memory card slots and PictBridge port; good color scans.
The grayscale scan showed obvious compression in both ends: Best Printers for CNET Labs’ inkjet multifunction speed tests pages per minute Longer bars indicate better performance. The XP “Small-in-One” printer turns in high scores for print quality, a versatile Visit manufacturer site for details. The printer is working fine. Additionally, we saw a lot of jagged cannon and wicking, even though we printed on Lexmark’s premium paper.
The Lexmark X is a high-end version of the X, which we reviewed recently. Even worse cannon its photo print speed: Overall, the X will suffice for casual home users, but more demanding users should look at the Canon Pixma MPthe same amount of money will vanon you better print quality across the board, though text prints will be bit slower, and it’s not network-ready.
The X’s text print quality left a lot to be desired on our tests.
Its main claim to fame is that it’s fully Wi-Fi compatible straight out of the box, and in our tests this proved quick and easy to set up. It is very easy to use and works better than any other printer I have owned. The color had a x455 look and the photo elements were a bit grainy.
Using the standard capacity ink cartridges supplied with the printer, ink costs are fiendishly expensive, at over 5p per mono print and nearly 12p for colour. Details need to be sharpened, and we saw evidence of graininess and horizontal striations, though they weren’t as evident as what we saw in the graphics prints. The mobile world might finally get exciting again in We can’t see this device remaining in one piece for long under heavy office conditions.
Straight edges showed jaggedness instead of clean, sharp lines.